Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23731 (PAT)

Jivan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./41411/2026 · 2026-07-01

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41411 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2025 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1. Jivan Yadav Son of Damodar Yadav R/O village-Lalpur, P.S.-Khaira, District-Jamui. 2. Gorelal Yadav Son of Damodar Yadav R/O village-Lalpur, P.S.-Khaira, District-Jamui. 3. Kailu Yadav Son of Sahdev Yadav R/O village-Lalpur, P.S.-Khaira, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 461 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 329(3), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence, petitioners along with named accused persons were ploughing the land of the informant. On protest, co-accused Lalu Yadav tried to crush the informant through tractor and anyhow he saved his life but his left hand got injured. When the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41411 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 family members of the informant came there, the accused persons assaulted them with lathi, farsa etc. causing injury to them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties. Informant is the aggressor and the injuries caused to the injured are simple in nature. Other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 91202 of 2025 and order dated 08.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20367 of 2026. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have clean antecedent. Petitioner No. 3 is accused in one another case in which he has been acquitted. Petitioners undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41411 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 461 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T