- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 381 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. MAHADEVAPPA, S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT LALANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, K.R.NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAHMANYA P.D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602, BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. L.S.SOMASHEKARAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 3A SMT. NEELAMMA, W/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT LALANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. 3B LOKESH, S/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HEAD MASTER, LOIN SCHOOL, HUNSUR ROAD, K R NAGAR, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. 3C 3C1 MANJUNATHA, S/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. L.C.REKHA, W/O LATE MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 3C2 YASAHWANTHA, S/O LATE MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.3C1 AND 3C2 ARE RESIDING AT LALANAHALLI, WARD NO.15, BASAVESHWARA BLOCK, K R NAGAR - 571 602, MYSURU DISTRICT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 3D PRABHAVATHI, D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, HAGANAHALLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 602. 3E KOMALA, W/O SIDDALINGAPPA, D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH MAGENAHALLI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 602. 3F RATHNA, D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O KATTAIAH, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 602. 4 4A CHANDRASHEKARAIAH ALIAS KALINGAIAH, S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, SINCE DIED REPRESENTED BY LRS SMT. RAJAMANI, W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 4B NANDISH, S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 4C SATHISH, S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4D MANJULA, D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 4E SARVAMANGALA, D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 4F VASANTH, D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.4A TO 4F ALL ARE R/AT DODDA LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASAVARAJA POST, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. 5 SUNDARAMANI, D/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, R/AT LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI.NATARAJ BALLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3(A & B), R3 (1 & 2), R3D, R3E & R3(F); NOTICE TO R4(A-F) DISPENSED WITH) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.114 ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO I) CALL FOR RECORDS IN W.P. NO.35199/2012 (LR) ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 COURT; II) REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2023 MADE IN W.P.NO.35199/2012 (LR) (ANNEXURE -A) PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE DIRECTION TO THE LAND TRIBUNAL TO GRANT TENANCY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND ADMEASURING 30 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.376 OF LALANHALLI VILLAGE, KASAB HOBLI, KRISHNARAJANAGR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, AND ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN, TO GRANT TENANCY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND ADMEASURING 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.376 OF LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAB HOBLI, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this petition, the petitioner has sought for reviewing the order dated 07.02.2023 in WP No.35199/2012 (Annexure-A). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the total extent of land in Survey No.376 of Lalanahalli Village, Krishnarajanagar Taluk, Mysore, is measuring 3 acres 22 guntas, out of which, the father of the petitioner was cultivating the land to an extent of 1 acre 30 guntas. Learned counsel appearing for - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024 the petitioners further submitted that there is an error apparent on the face of the record as to the extent of land considered by this Court, in the order dated 07.02.2023 in W.P.No.35199/2012 (Annexure-A). 3. However, taking into consideration the fact that this Court has considered the entire material on record and followed the judgment of the full Bench of this Court in the case of Lokayya Poojary Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2012 Karnataka 4345 has passed the impugned order at Annexure-A. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that there is no error apparent on the face of the record. 5. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that no interference is called for in this petition. Accordingly petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1