APHC010445952024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23103/2024 Between: 1. VELICHARLA SRIKANTH, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, R/O. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ULAVAPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ULAVAPADU,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4rt respondent dated 27.09.2024 RCB/176/2024 in terminating the services 2 of mine as MDU Operator for MDU-PR55001 Vehicle which is illegal , arbitrary of contrary to Article 14, 21 of the constitution of India consequently set aside the action of the 4rt respondent issued dated 27.09.2024 RCB/176/2024 by appointing the petitioner as MDU operator to the vehicle - PR55001 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the 4rt respondent RCB/176/2024 dated 27.09.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASU L Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 31.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. On 16.02.2026, learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and the matter posted 8for dismissal9. Despite the matter being listed under the caption 8for dismissal9, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02nd March, 2026 RKS