APHC010451122022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27571/2022 Between: 1. SHAIK GHOUSE KHUREED, S/O SHAIK ELLIYAS BASHA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. PLUMBER, R/O. D.NO.16-32-35, THOTAMMA VARI STREET, RECHARLAPETA, KAKIKNADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK ELLIYAS BASHA, S/O SHAIK ABDULLAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.16-32-35, THOTAMMA VARI STREET, RECHARLAPETA, KAKIKNADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK NASEEMA BEGUM, W/O SHAIK ELLIYAS BASHA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.16-32-35, THOTAMMA VARI STREET, RECHARLAPETA, KAKIKNADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DISHA (MAHILA) P.S., BESIDE II TOWN POLICE STATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK SILARBI, W/O SHAIK GHOUSE KHUREED, AGED. 30 YEARS, OCC. NURSING OFFICER, NRC SCHEME, 0/O. PEDIATRIC DEPARTMENT, GGH, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent no-3 calling the petitioners to their police station at the behest of Respondent no-4 and thereby making them to sit from morning to evening in the station to settle the matrimonial dispute with regard to custody of children as 2 illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of the Constitutional of India and consequently direct the Respondent no-3 not to call the petitioners to the police station except in accordance with the law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent no-3 calling the petitioners to their police station at the behest of Respondent no-4 and thereby making them to sit from morning to evening in the station to settle the matrimonial dispute with regard to custody of children as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of the Constitutional of India and consequently direct the Respondent no-3 not to call the petitioners to the police station except in accordance with the law and pass ...= At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the cause in the subject matter does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recorded. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 27571 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*