IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16159 of 2026 Decided on: 17th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Krishni Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Kuldeep Singh Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.9484 of 2024, decided on 10.03.2026 2 preferred any representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 17, 2026 Judge Mukesh