Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2372 (CHH)

RADHIKA ADONNI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/224/2026 · 2026-03-15

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12375-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 224 of 2026 1 - Radhika Adonni D/o Bhupendra Krishna Tamaskar Aged About 46 Years R/o In Front Of Konher Garden, Chatapara Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Bhupendra Krishna Tamaskar S/o Lt. Shri Krishna Rao Tamaskar Aged About 84 Years R/o In Front Of Konher Garden, Chatapara Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Bank Of India Through Managing Director, State Bank Bhawan, Nariman Point, Mumbai (Maharashtra) 3 - Regional Manager State Bank Of India, Regional Business Office, 3rd Floor, Vikash Bhawan, Nehru Chowk Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Branch Manager State Bank Of India, Collectorate Branch, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, Deputy A.G. and Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.03.17 11:56:17 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 16.03.2026 1. Heard Mr. Prateek Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondents / State and Mr. Harshal Chouhan, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. The appellant has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 07.01.2026 (ANNEXURE A/1), passed in WP(C) no. 4885/2025by Hon'ble Single Bench and further be pleased to direct to decide the WPC No. 4885/2025 expeditiously within one month, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has filed I.A. No. 02/2026 i.e. application for withdrawal of the appeal stating that due to inadvertent mistake, amendment in Act of 2006 was missed out and instant writ appeal is filed though not maintainable. 4. In view of the above submission, I.A. No.02/2026 is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet