APHC010444792021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6406/2021 Between: 1.K.JAGANNADHA SARMA, S/O SASTRY INDIAN, MALE, AGED ABOUT 35YEARS, R/O 2-2-647/108/A, FLAT 401, KSN SAI RESIDENCY, CE COLONY, BAGH AMBER PET, HYDERABAD.500013. 2.KVS SASTRY, S/O JAGNNADHA RAO, INDIAN, MALE, AGED ABOUT 63YEARS, 0CC. PUROHIT, R/O 2-2-647/108/A, FLAT 401, KSN SAI RESIDENCY, CE COLONY, BAGH AMBER PET, HYDERABAD.500013. 3.K REVATHI DEVI, W/O SASTRY, INDIAN, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 57YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O 2-2-647/108/A, FLAT 401, KSN SAI RESIDENCY, CE COLONY, BAGH AMBER PET, HYDERABAD.500013. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.SATYANNAPURANA, D/O SURYANARAYANA, INDIAN FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, D.NO.1-511/5, RAYUDUPALEM VILLAGE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.VINJAMURI RANGA BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioner nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. Even after six years no notice was served on Respondent No.1 and it appears that the Petitioner has no interest in this case. In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 23.02.2026 VTS