[2026:JHHC:25394] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1432 of 2026 ------ 1. Maja Mirja @ Ajmat Husain @ Md. Maja Mirja, aged about 27 years. 2. Soraj Mirja @ Siraj Uddin @ Siraj Khan @ Soraj Khan, aged about 68 years, 3. Gudan Mirja @ Gudu Alam, aged about 43 years, 4. Ajmal Mirja @ Asmul Mirja @ Md. Ajmal, aged about 34 years, 5. Fucho Mirja @ Meraj Mirja @ Fucho, aged about 49 years, 6. Pal Mirja @ Pal @ Md. Afzal Hussain, aged about 37 years, All are S/o Iliyash Mirja @ Iliyash Miya, R/o Village-Lataki (Mandreya Tola), P.O.- Lataki, P.S.- Jamua, Dist.- Giridih. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Takulal Singh, S/o Late Budha`n Singh, R/o Village- Lataki Tola Mandra Tola, P.O. & P.S.- Jamua, Dist.- Giridih. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate Ms. Suman Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-21-08-2026 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 1792 of 2018 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance vide order dated 24.08.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 1792 of 2018 was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 24.08.2018. It is next submitted that the case was listed before this Court on 24.08.2018 and the petitioners were directed to comply the order dated 17.08.2017 within one week from the date of that order but the same could not be complied with, because the order has not been conveyed to the petitioners; which resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No.1792 of 2018 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 24.08.2018. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 24.08.2018 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is further submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.1792 of 2018 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.1792 of 2018 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection to the prayer of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 1792 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No. 1792 of 2018 before the appropriate Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 21.08.2026 Amar/