2026:HHC:39779 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Review Petition No.  : 07 of 2026 Decided on    : 17.09.2026 Director General BSF …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge, The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.   Lokender   Paul   Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel. For the respondents      :    Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates   General,   with   Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Heard for some time. 2. At this stage, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner would be satisfied in   case   the   judgment   under   review   i.e.   judgment   dated 26.06.2024, passed in CWP No. 3980/2024, is not treated to be a precedent for future litigation, since, respondent No. 4 Ranjeet Singh, has already been released from jail, after serving his sentence. 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:39779 3. The   prayer   of   learned   Senior   Panel   Counsel being genuine, is allowed.  The review petition is disposed of, with the observation that the judgment under review i.e. judgment   dated   26.06.2024,   passed   in   CWP   No. 3980/2024, shall not be treated as a precedent in future. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge ( Virender Singh ) Judge 17th September, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)