ROHIT KUMAR alias ROHIT KUMAR v. HIRA PAL SHARMA AND ANOTHER
CRMPM/526/2026 · 2026-04-06
Sandeep Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2371 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2371 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Rohit Kumar alias Raman Kumar vs. Hira Lal Sharma and another
Cr.MP(M) No.526 of 2026
06.04.2026 Present Mr. B.R. Kashyap, Advocate, for the applicant/ petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondent No.2/State.
Cr.MP(M) No.526 of 2026
By way of instant application, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation.
Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on the account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay of 23 days in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The petition be registered. The application stands disposed of
Cr. Revision No._____ of 2026
Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2/State. Separate notice be issued to
respondent No.1, returnable within a period of eight weeks, on taking steps within one week.
Cr.MPST No. 1133/2026
Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks. In the meanwhile, substantive sentence imposed by learned Court below shall remain suspended, subject to the applicant’s depositing 50% of the compensation amount and furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, within a period of eight weeks, with the condition that the applicant shall appear in the Court as and when directed and shall surrender to serve out the sentence imposed, in case the revision is ultimately dismissed.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge April 06, 2026 (shankar)