Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2371 (CAL)

HABIBUR RAHAMAN @ BAKUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/363/2025 · 2026-02-17

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.02.2026 Ct. No.42 D/L 11 Mujahid CRR 363 of 2025 Habibur Rahaman @ Bakul Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Ms. Surasri Baidya …for the petitioner 1. During the course of submission, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the revision before the learned Additional Sessions Judge taking all the contentions. 2. Liberty granted. 3. It is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case. It is also made clear that the time consumed filed in this revision petition be also taken in account while computing period of limitation to be filed before the learned Additional Sessions Judge 4. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)