RIYANSH SINGH @ SWATANTRA @ RDX v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6253/2026 · 2026-08-19
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23705 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23705 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:24926 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6253 of 2026
------ Riyansh Singh @ Swatantra @ RDX, aged about 22 years, s/o Manoj Singh, resident of Qtr No. DT1535, Tanki Side, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Advocate For the State
: Ms. Shweta Singh, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.04 Dated- 19.08.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.414 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 308(4)/ 351(2)/ 351(3)/ 111(2)/ 111(3)/111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of gang of criminal in the name and style of Rahul Singh gang was involved in commission of extortion of Rs.5,00,00,000/- from the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though charge sheet has bene submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his self- confessional statement made in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026 and apart from that, there is no other material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial
of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi, in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.414 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
19.08.2026 Gunjan-