Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23704 (CHH)

GURUPAL BHALLA v. SMT. SHYAMLI CHATERJEE

MA/10/2022 · 2026-06-28

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26405 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 10 of 2022 1 - Gurupal Bhalla S/o Late Ajayak Singh Bhalla Aged About 62 Years R/o Maaldhakka Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Harmeet Singh Ghai S/o Late Jogendar Singh Ghai Aged About 60 Years R/o Itwari Bazar, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Rajindar Singh S/o Late Gurucharan Singh, Aged About 64 Years R/o Itwari Bazar, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Appellants versus 1 - Smt. Shyamli Chaterjee D/o Late Indranath Banerjee, (Wife Ashit Baran Banerjee) Aged About 64 Years R/o Dayal Nagar, Pandwa, District- Hoogly (West Bengal) 2 - Smt. Tamali Mukherjee W/o Swapan Mukherjee, (D/o Late Indranath Banerjee) Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Sikhra, Post Haridaspur, P.S. Pandwa, District Hoogly (West Bengal) Present Address- Goodluck Hotel, Room No. 112, Station Chowk, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Shaifali Ray W/o Swapan Kumar Ray, (D/o Late Indranathbanerjee) Aged About 59 Years R/o Ramlal Ghosh Lane, Post- Howrah, District - Howrah, (West Bengal) Also At - S.C. Deb Lane, Post- Kone Nagar, P.S. Uttar Para, District Hoogly (West Bangal) Also St S.C. Deb Lane, Post- Kone Nagar, P.S. Uttar Para, District Hoogly (West Bengal) ... Respondents For appellants : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 and 3 : Mr. Mayank Gupta, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Anurag Singh, Adv. For respondent No. 2 : Mr. Devendra Bhardwaj, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sinha, Adv. 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 29-6-2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that, original Civil Suit No. A/13/2021 ( Gurupal Bhalla & Ors. Vs. Shyamli Chaterjee & Ors.) has been disposed of by learned District Judge, Raigarh on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties. Hence, this MA has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for respondents conceded the above submission. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, this MA is dismissed having become infructuous. 4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.06.30 10:43:53 +0530