D. Krishna Mohan v. Govt. of A.P. rep.by its Secretary Irrigation
WP/937/2014 · 2026-02-03
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23704 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23704 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010438572014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 937/2014 Between:
1. D. KRISHNA MOHAN,, S/O LATE D.V. NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: OFFICE ASSISTANT, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA), ANANTHAPUR, R/O H.NO.4-148, LST ROAD, NEAR RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY TEMPLE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. GOVT OF A P REP BY ITS SECRETARY IRRIGATION, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA) ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY (DWMA) DRDA COMPOUND, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ to the respondents No.2 and 3 by declaring the act of respondent NO.2 and 3 for removing this petitioner vide impugned proceedings RC.No.Bithm68/2011 dt.7-12-2011 from his post of Office Assistant in the office of Respondent No.3 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 & 15 of the Constitution of India
2
and the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently set aside the impugned removal proceedings RC.No.B/68/2011 dt.7-12-2011,issued by the respondent NO.3 and direct the respondents No.2 & 3 to reinstate the petitioner into his service as Office Assistant with all back wages and consequential benefits and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P BHAKTHAVATSAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
04.02.2026 PNS