Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2370 (JHR)

GANPAT SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Acq. App./58/2024 · 2026-02-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:5532 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal No. 58 of 2024 ------ Ganpat Singh, aged about 43 years, son of Kartik Singh, resident of Pichhari, P.O. & P.S.-Petarbar, Dist.-Bokaro (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Raju Digar, aged about 45 years, son of late Suresh Digar, resident of Pichhari, P.O. & P.S.-Petarbar, Dist.-Bokaro (Jharkhand) .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For Resp. No.2 : Mr. Dilip Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.08 Dated- 25.02.2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 666, the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Acquittal Appeal with liberty to file an appeal under Section 413 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the concerned court. Permission is accorded. This Acquittal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the appellant. In view of disposal of the instant Acquittal Appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25.02.2026 Sonu/Gunjan-