HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 60/2026 Smt. Raj W/o Shri Mahendra Lal, (Retired Ips), Aged About 61 Years, Haryana State Cadre, Physically Resident Of House No.928, Sector-8, Panchkula (Haryana) In The Plaint And In The Impugned Order,resident At Village Haznaka, Tehsil- Kotkasim, Distt. Alwar, Rajsthan Has Been Just To Usurp Jurisdiction Of Trial Court At Kotkasim Alwer District And The Disputed Agricultural Land Is Situated At Village Haznaka. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shakti Singh, Aged About 66 Years, Son Of Late Shri Jainarayan 2. Mahendra Singh, Aged About 68 Years, S/o Late Sh. Jainarayan 3. Jaidayal, Aged About 82 Years, S/o Sh. Jainarayan 4. Amilal, (Since Deceased) 4/1. Shri Rakesh, S/o Late Shri Amilal 4/2. Shri Sunil Kumar, S/o Late Shri Amilal 4/3. Smt. Santosh Devi D/o Late Shri Amilal, Defendants Petitioners No.1 To 4 Are Sons Of Lt. Shri Jainarayan And Nos. 4/1 To 4/2 All Are Residing At Haznaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 5. Tarachand, S/o.shri Heera Lal 6. Harisingh, S/o.late Sh. Bholu 7. Hariram, S/o Late Sh. Bholu 8. Hariprakash, S/o Late Shri Bholu 9. Harikaran, S/o Late Shri Bholu 10. Bhagat Singh, S/o. Late Sh. Haripal 11. Nikhlesh, S/o. Late Haripal 12. Dulichand, S/o. Jodha Chamar 13. Deendayal, S/o. Jodha Chamar 14. Heeralal S/o. Shri Harphool Singh, All 5 To 14 Are Residents Of Village-Nashopur, Tehsil- Kotkasim,district Alwar, Rajasthan. 15. Bheem Singh, S/o Harphool Singh 16. Bhupendra Singh, S/o Harphool Singh. 17. Ghanshyam, S/o Harphool Singh 18. Rajendra, S/o Netram., All Nos. 15 To 18 Are Residing At Shiv Nagar, In Front Of Kishanlal Public College, Delhi Road, Rewadi, Distt. Rewadi, (Haryana). 19. Santosh, W/o Late Lalchand 20. Diksha D/o Late Lalchand, By The Time Filing Of Suit She (2 of 3) [WRW-60/2026] Was Minor Hence, Represented By Her Natural Mother Santosh Devi, But Now She Has Become Major. 21. Ratan Lal S/o Late Netram., All Nos.19 To 21 Are Residing At Village Jadthal. 22. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Land Holder Tehsildar, Mundawar, Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan 23. Board Of Revenue, Through Its Registrar Ajmer, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : -------- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 19/03/2026 1. For the grounds mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, delay in filing in review petition is condoned. 2. Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act is accordingly allowed. 3. The order passed by this Court dated 06.11.2025 was tested by the petitioner before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the SLP was withdrawn without pressing any liberty to file review. 4. With the change of counsel, another review petition has been filed before this Court stating that there was no occasion to consider allowing the respondents to cross-examine the two witnesses as the respondents had already withdrawn their intention to cross-examine, which has already been noted by the learned Single Judge too. 5. We find that submissions cannot be examined in review petition. The scope of review petition is limited. This has been held (3 of 3) [WRW-60/2026] by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Karnail Singh Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2024) 14 SCC 1. 6. In light of the above, the review petition is dismissed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ 82/-Mayank