Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23695 (CHH)

SANTOSH AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/195/2025 · 2026-06-24

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26148 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 195 of 2025 1 - Santosh Agrawal S/o Gopichand Agrawal Aged About 64 Years R/o Besides Jagnee Fuels, Link Road Janjgir, Ward No. 08, Janjgir, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Municipal Council Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, Office At Collectorate Campus, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 5 - Vishnu Yadav S/o Ramnarayan Yadav Aged About 40 Years Ware Member, Ward No. 07, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Divy Jha, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/06/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may, kindly be please to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondent no. 2 and 5 from constructing the permanent construction of road on the pathway with immediate effect. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the facts and the circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat