IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3223 of 2026 Decided on: 18th March, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sita Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3, which is waived by Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General. Considering the grievance projected for the petitioner and the nature of order being passed hereinafter, neither notice of this petition is required to be issued to respondents No.4 to 6 nor reply is required to be called for from the appearing respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 2. Petitioner is with the grievance that respondent No.2 is not taking requisite action in accordance with law on his complaint regarding encroachment by respondents No.4 to 6 on the government land. 3. Taking into consideration the complaints moved by the petitioner on 27.10.2019 (Annexure P-1) and 20.05.2024 (Annexure P-2) to respondents No.3 and 2, respectively, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority to consider, examine and take appropriate action on the above complaints of the petitioner, expeditiously, in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 18, 2026 Judge Mukesh