2026:JHHC:24435 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7183 of 2026 Ejaj Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Md. Akhtar Hussain @ Aktar Hussain, resident of village Kewatatand, P.O. & P.S. – Tisri, District – Giridih … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Murthy, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP --- 03/14.08.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2025 in connection with POCSO Case No.122 of 2025 arising out of Tisri P.S. Case No.69 of 2025, registered under Sections 126(2), 70 (2) of the B.N.S. and 04/06 of the POCSO Act, but charge has been framed under Sections 137 (2), 126 (2), 70 (2) and 61 (2) of the B.N.S. and 04/06 of the POCSO Act, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected on merit earlier in B.A. No.3867 of 2026 vide order dated 07.05.2026. Learned counsel further submits that as on date, only one witness remains to be examined, who is the doctor. 4. The learned counsel for the State submits that the next date in the trial is 01.09.2026 and on that day, the doctor will also be produced as witness. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and 2026:JHHC:24435 2 considering the fact that the trial is at fag end and the State has undertaken to produce the remaining one witness before the court, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. If the remaining witness is not produced and examined, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after 2 months. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:14.08.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:17.08.2026