17.06.2026 Sl. No. 37 AMR Ct.No.28 CRM(A) 1571 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. And In the matter of : Mazibar Rahaman Biswas @ Mojibur .... Petitioner Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Ms. Suchismita Chakroborty Ms. Afsana Khan Mr. Premraj Sharma …for the Petitioner Mr. Sayan Mukherjee …for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to political reasons. He is the Prodhan of the concerned Gram Panchayet. Other members had moved a “no confidence motion” against him. A date was fixed for hearing. On the very morning of the said date, an FIR was lodged that the victim was abducted by the petitioner and others. The petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the FIR, the statements of the victim recorded 2 before the learned Magistrate and the statements of other independent witnesses who saw the abduction including ones who were there in car with the victim from where he was taken away. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)