M/S. RAVI ELECTRICALS REWINDING WORKS,REP.BY PROP.,VSKPTM. v. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P.LTD.,REP.BY CE.,VSKPTM.,&ANR
WP/3506/2013 · 2026-03-02
Ninala Jayasurya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23669 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23669 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010437752013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 3506/2013 Between:
1. M/S. RAVI ELECTRICALS REWINDING WORKS,REP.BY PROP.,VSKPTM., REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI V.V.BRAHMAJI, GAN COMPLEX, OPP. APSEB SUB- STATION, CHITTIVANI PALEM, VISAKAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A P LTD REP BY CE VSKPTM ANR, REP. BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER, VISAKAPATNAM ZONE, 220 KV GAJUWAKA SS PREMISES. APTRANSCO, VISAKAPATNAM - 26.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER TRANSMISSION APTRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto call for records and issue an
order or Direction one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the order of the first respondent dated 24-1-2013 bearing no. Lr.
2
NJS,J
W.P.NO.3506 OF 2013 No.CE/VSPZone/AP Transco/Tech/AE3/F. Doc/D.No. 391/13 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 4352 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the first respondent dated 24-01-2013 bearing Lr. No. CE/VSP Zone/AP Transco/Tech/AE3/F.Doc/D.No. 391 /13 pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SURESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following:
3
NJS,J
W.P.NO.3506 OF 2013
ORDER:
Mr.Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Suresh,
learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the writ petition, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 03.03.2026
LSP