SMT DALVAI ADHIKESHAVULA TEJASWARI v. UNION OF INDIA
WP/17865/2024 · 2026-06-23
Suraj Govindaraj
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23668 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23668 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31098 WP No. 17865 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 17865 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. DALVAI ADHIKESHAVULA TEJASWARI D/O LATE ADHIKESHAVULU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO.5/25, KRISHNA KRUPA, 3RD CROSS, NEAR ASHOKA PILLAR, IST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011 KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARENDRA BABU .B.K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTRY OF FINANCE, RAISINA HILLS, NEW DELHI.
2.
JOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, ZONAL OFFICE, B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING, SHANTI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560027
3.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING, SHANTI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560027
4.
SMT. NALINI RAVIKRISHNAN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31098 WP No. 17865 of 2024
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING, SHANTI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560027 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R4 NOT TO HARASS THE PETITIONER ON THE GROUND OF IMPLICATING THE PETITIONER IN FALSE CASES IF THE PETITIONER DO NOT AGREE FOR SIGNING THE PAPERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
1. Direct the 4th Respondent not to harass the petitioner on the ground of implicating the petitioner in false cases if the petitioner do not agree for signing the papers.
2. Direct the 3rd and 4th Respondent not to harass the petitioner, forcing her to sign on blank papers and to give statements as per their directions.
3. Direct the Respondents not to arrest the Petitioner without following the due process of law.
4. Issue such other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The said memo reads as follows:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31098 WP No. 17865 of 2024
"The Petitioner above named prays that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as not pressed and permitted withdraw the same, in the interest of equity and justice."
3. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 102