APHC010437212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6272/2021 Between: 1.P.RUPESH, S/O PARAMDHAMA NAIDU, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC. BANK MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, KAIKALUR, R/O 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO.B4, SWARNA RESIDENCY, CURRENCY NAGAR, RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), VJ POLYTECHNIC, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.M.SAMATH, AGED 28 YEARS, PURSUING STUDIES IN M.B.A. VISWAVISWANI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT COURSES, HYDERABAD. 3.P. PARAMDHAMA NAIDU, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO.B4, SWARNA RESIDENCY, CURRENCY NAGAR, RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), VJ POLYTECHNIC, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.P. THULASI, W/O PARAMDHARNA NAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O 3RD FLOOR, FLAT NO.B4, SWARNA RESIDENCY, CURRENCY NAGAR, RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), VJ POLYTECHNIC, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIPARTHI RURAL POLICE 2 STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3.D SANDHYA RANI, W/O LATE THARUN, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O CHINNAPALLI VILLAGE, TADIPARTHI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.1556 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadipatri. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 12.02.2026 VTS