Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23659 (KAR)

MR. S R PRASANNAKUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12378/2026 · 2026-06-18

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29905 WP No. 12378 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12378 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. S R PRASANNAKUMAR SON OF LATE MR. S. H. RANGAPPA, AGED 63 YEARS, PROPRIETOR M/S SRINIVASA BOREWELLS. NO.5. NEW EXTENSION, KOLAR - 563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VASANTH V. FERNANDES, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, 3RD GATE, 3RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, RURAL DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, 2ND FLOOR, E BLOCK, K. H. B. BUILDING, CAUVERY BHAVAN, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29905 WP No. 12378 of 2026 K. G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER NOW DESIGNATED AS ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF RURAL DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, 1ST FLOOR, E BLOCK, K. H. B. BUILDING, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, D. C. OFFICE BUILDING, S-11, KUMBARAHALLI POST, KOLAR - 563 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUSDIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO MAKE PAYMENT TO THE PETITIONER IN SUM OF RS.8,61,31,000/- (RUPEES EIGHT CORE SIXTY ONE LAKH AND THIRTY ONE THOUSAND ONLY) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29905 WP No. 12378 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following relief: "WHEREFORE, the Petitioner prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to make payment to the Petitioner in a sum of Rs.8,61,31,000/- (Rupees Eight Core Sixty-One Lakh and Thirty- One Thousand only) and to grant such other reliefs as to this Honourable Court may seem fit and proper under the circumstances of this case, in furtherance of Justice and Equity." 3. The petitioner claims that, in terms of the instructions which have been issued by the respondents, the petitioner has dig borewells at Kolar and Srinivasapura Taluk, as regards to which bills were raised by the petitioner, which have remained unpaid. It is in that background that the petitioner is before the Court. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29905 WP No. 12378 of 2026 4. The representation which has been submitted by the petitioner on 22.05.2024 at Annexure-D has not been considered. 5. Whenever any works are allotted by the State or an instrumentality of the State, the said instrumentality is required to make payment of the due amounts as per the applicable agreement, work order and/or the like. 6. In the present case, the petitioner claims that he has completed the work, as regards which the amounts have not been paid. The representation which has been submitted has also not been considered. This representation, submitted on 22.05.2024, was required to be considered by the respondents, the necessary orders passed either accepting or rejecting the said request so as to enable the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies. None of these actions have been taken. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29905 WP No. 12378 of 2026 7. Hence, I pass the following: ORDER i. Writ petition is allowed. ii. A mandamus is issued directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.05.2024 and pass necessary orders thereon within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner. The same would have to be considered on the basis of the available documents. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29