Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23651 (KAR)

MOHAMMED RAFIQ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17438/2026 · 2026-06-23

Suraj Govindaraj

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31103 WP No. 17438 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 17438 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MOHAMMED RAFIQ S/O. AUDRAMA BEARY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.2-116-A, PILICHANDIKALLU HOUSE, GURUVAYANAKERE POST, KUVETTU VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K DISTRICT - 574 217. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHAMMED MUSTHAFA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HOME, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE. PUTTUR SUB-DIVISION, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574201. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER BELTHANGADY POLICE STATION, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574214. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31103 WP No. 17438 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2025 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PUTTUR IN ACPTR-ADM NO.MAG.50/2025-26 UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE KARNATAKA PREVENTION OF SLAUGHTER AND PRESERVATION OF CATTLE ACT, 2020, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: A. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 27.11.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Puttur in ACPTR-ADM No.MAG:50/2025-26 under Section 8 of the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020, which is produced at ANNEXURE-A, in the interest of justice and equity. B. Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. What is challenged in the present petition is an order passed under Sub-Sections (4) and (5) of Section - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31103 WP No. 17438 of 2026 8 of the Karnataka Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act, 2020 (for short 'Act, 2020'). The Act provides for a statutory appeal under Section 10 of the 'Act, 2020'. 4. It is therefore for the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy. When a statutory remedy is available, a writ petition would not be maintainable. 5. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such appellate remedy, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6