Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2365 (ALL)

SAHABAJ CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/17496/2026 · 2026-05-04

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17496 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "1. To, Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No.RST/5773/2025 bearing computerize Case No. T 202505200105773 (Ranu Chauhan Versus Mitthoo) under section 34/209 (ज) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible preferably by way of day to day hearing within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned case is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sahabaj Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad