Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23646 (KAR)

NATESH v. GOWRAMMA

MFA/3890/2020 · 2026-06-23

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31008-DB MFA No. 3890 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3890 OF 2020(MV-I) BETWEEN: NATESH S/O RAMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT HARAVE VILLAGE AND POST, GAVADAGERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SYED ABDUL SABOOR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. GOWRAMMA W/O DODDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT KODIYALA VILLAGE, MIRLE HOBLI, K.R.NAGARA TQ., 2. M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THE MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., 924/1, RASIKA MOTORS, CH 8/1, KANTHARAJA URS ROAD, LAKSHMIPURA, MYSURU-570 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C.SEETHARAM RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R2 [ABSENT]; V/O/DTD:16.01.2021, NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH) Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31008-DB MFA No. 3890 of 2020 THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.30.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.639/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MACT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called twice, no one appears for the appellant. When the matter was last listed on 04.06.2026, the following order was passed: “Learned Counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file duly attested translated copies of the documents/depositions on record supported by an affidavit as required under Order XIII Rule 12 of CPC (Karnataka Amendment) failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. If the translations are filed, list on 23.06.2026.” 2. The office report is that the affidavit (as required by order dated 04.06.2026) is yet to be filed. Moreover, we note from the Trial Court Record that though various depositions require translation, however the translated - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31008-DB MFA No. 3890 of 2020 deposition of only PW-2 has been filed. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2