JAGDISH RAJ v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation
EX.P./2092/2026 · 2026-09-17
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23642 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23642 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No. 2092 of 2026.
Decided on : 17
th September
, 2026
Jagdish Raj ...Petitioner.
Versus HRTC & Anr. ....Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Learned counsel for the respondent corporation has placed on record office letter dated 07.08.2026 and on that basis submitted that
judgment in issue has been fully complied with.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above position.
3. In view of above, the instant execution petition to stand
disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 17th September, 2026.
(jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?