NAVIN VISHWAKARMA ALIAS NAVIN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7467/2026 · 2026-08-21
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23631 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23631 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:25291
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7467 of 2026
----- Navin Vishwakarma @ Navin Kumar, son of Mohan Vishwakarma, resident of village and PO-Bhendra, PS-Nawadih, District-Bokaro
… Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Prasad, APP
…......
03 /21.08.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order.
3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
4. The prayer of bail of this petitioner was earlier rejected vide order dated 20.02.2026 passed in B.A. No. 730 of 2026.
5. It has been submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, on instruction, that the next date in this case is 28.08.2026 and within one month from 28.08.2026 all the witnesses can be produced.
6. Since the trial is in progress and considering the submission of the learned APP, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. The Trial Court is directed to record the statement of all the witnesses as and when they are produced. It is expected that the trial will be conducted on day to day basis.
2026:JHHC:25291
2
7. Considering the aforesaid fact, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with S.T. No. 361 of 2025 arising out of Nawadih PS Case No. 49 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, FTC Bermo at Tenughat stands rejected.
8. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
9. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial at the earliest. It is expected that the undertaking given by the prosecution to produce the witnesses will be adhered to.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 21.08.2026 Tanuj/CP-3
Uploaded on 21.08.2026