Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23631 (CHH)

The Associated Cement Company Limited v. (Delered) Yashpal Gupta (Died) Through Lrs.

WPC/3421/2017 · 2026-06-29

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26559 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3421 of 2017 The Associated Cement Company Limited Now Acc Limited, Jamul Cement Works, Jamul, Through Shri Manoj Kumar Shrivastava, Director Plant, Jamul, Tahsil And District- Durg (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - (Delered) Yashpal Gupta (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated 07-12-2024. 1.1 - (A) Dhananjaya Gupta S/o Late Yashpal Gupta Aged About 55 Years R/o H. No. Ward 8, Jamul Bada, Polsai Chowk, Durg (C.G.) 1.2 - (B) Sandhya Gupta W/o Late Yashpal Gupta Aged About 73 Years R/o H. No. Ward 8, Jamul Bada Polsai Chowk, Durg (C.G.) 1.3 - (C) Sangeeta Agrawal W/o Sanjay Agrawal Aged About 53 Years R/o L.I.G., 469, Padmanabhpur, Ward 46, Durg (C.G.) 1.4 - (D) Akansha Gupta W/o Naresh Chandra Gupta Aged About 51 Years R/o H. No. 8, Vivekanand Nagar, Main Road, Raipur (C.G.) 1.5 - (E) Swati Agrawal W/o Anupam Agrawal Aged About 49 Years R/o Baniya Para, Hanuman Chabutra, Purani Basti Raipur (C.G.) 1.6 - (F) Nandita Agrawal W/o Vinod Kumar Agrawal Aged About 48 Years R/o H-184 C, Jindal Road, Krishna Vihar Colony, Raigarh (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.06.30 18:16:28 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Chandra, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 30/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that though the order of the Tehsildar was in favour of the applicant–Siyakali Bai vide order dated 07/09/1996, directing grant of possession of the land in question bearing Khasra No. 652/10.55 decimil, situated at Village Jamul, District Durg, the respondent has no objection if a fresh demarcation of the said land is conducted by the Tehsildar, Durg, and a fresh order is thereafter passed in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that he has no objection to the aforesaid proposal; however, he prays that if demarcation is undertaken, the same may be carried out in the presence of both the parties and that a specific time frame be fixed for completion of the exercise. 3. Considering the submissions made and by consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the Tehsildar, Durg shall carry out a fresh demarcation of the land bearing Khasra No. 652/10.55 decimil, situated at Village Jamul, District Durg, in accordance with law, in the presence of both the parties, after issuing due notice to them, and complete the exercise within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt/production of a certified copy of this order. 4. The parties are further directed to apprise and ensure compliance of this 3 order before the competent authority within a period of 25 days. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul