1 2026:CGHC:26442-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1665 of 2026 Nishant Gauraha S/o Shiv Shankar Gauraha Aged About 32 Years R/o Nutan Chowk Sarkanda District Bilaspur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Sarkanda District Bilaspur C.G. 2. Abc Nil ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Shashikant Chauhan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.06.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ravi Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 and Mr. Shashikant Chauhan, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.06.30 16:11:48 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and kindly be pleased to quash the FIR lodged dated 03/12/2025 (Annexure P/2) by Police Station Sarkanda, at Crime No. 1657 of 2025 registered for commission of offence under Section 69 of BNS, and also to quash the charge-sheet filed dated 20.01.2026 (Annexure P/3) with respect to petitioner at Case No.31 of 2026 before learned JMFC-Bilaspur for commission of offence committed under Section 69 of BNS and further to set aside the, First order taking cognizance dated 12.02.2026 in Sessions Trial No. 56 of 2026 (Annexure P/1) against the petitioner for offence committed under Section 69 of BNS, and same is pending before learned Sessions Judge – Bilaspur, District – Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Further to pass any other order as per facts and circumstance of the case.” 3. During the course of hearing, this Court noticed that the present petition suffers from several office objections/defaults. Thereupon, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after curing the said defects/defaults. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 3 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after curing the office objections/defaults, if so advised and in accordance with law. 6. Certified copies/original documents, if any, filed along with the present petition be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies thereof on the record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan