SANJEEV MISHRA ALIAS SANJIV MISHRA ALIAS SANJIV KUMAR MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7822/2026 · 2026-08-19
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23612 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23612 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:24899] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7822 of 2026
------ Sanjeev Mishra @ Sanjiv Mishra @ Sanjiv Kumar Mishra, aged about 42 years, son of Late Hari Shankar Mishra, resident of Gandhinagar Bagbera Near Railway High School, P.O. & P.S.- Bagbera, District- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sourav Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-19-08-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.165 of 2026 arising out of Gua (Bara Jamda O.P.) P.S. Case No.45 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2), 311, 331(4), 351(3), 117(2) and 308(4) of the B.N.S.,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted Rs.2,50,000/- and chain and bracelet. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-17 of the instant bail application, charge has been framed against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.3200 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the
case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chaibasa in connection with S.T. Case No.165 of 2026 arising out of Gua (Bara Jamda O.P.) P.S. Case No.45 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-19.08.2026-Animesh/