Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23611 (AP)

G.Prabhakara Gupta v. H.Y.Dora

CC/2243/2015 · 2026-03-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010443892015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2243/2015 Between: 1. G.PRABHAKARA GUPTA,, S/O.G.SUBBAIAH AGED 44 YEARS, R/O.8-1-113, MEDAR STREET RAYADURG, ANANTHAPURAMU - DIST. 2. B.DEVA VARMA,, S/O.DEVADAS AGED 41 YEARS, D.NO.12/404, SAI NAGAR ANANTHAPURAMU. 3. M.RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O.M.SRINIVASA SASTRY AGED 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2/26 KALYANDURGA, ANANTHAPURAMU - DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. H Y DORA, CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P.LIMITED SRINIVASA MANGAPURAM, TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. R N PRASAD REDDY, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER A.P.S.P.D.C.L ANANTHAPURAMU. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully not implementing the Order of the Hon'ble Court passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Kanta Rao in WPMP No.30987/2015 in W.P.No.23906/2015 dated 31.7.2015 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful non implementation of the interim orders dated 31.07.2015 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 30987 of 2015 in W.P. No.23906 of 2016. 2. Ms. Priyanvita Poppuri, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in view of the withdrawal of the main writ petition, the petitioners are not inclined to pursue the contempt case. 3. Sri Kota Venkata Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondents is present. 4. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.03.2026 GVK 3 47 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.2243 of 2015 Date: 06.03.2026 GVK