GHULAM HASSAN GANIE AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SOGAM
Bail App/139/2026 · 2026-07-29
Sanjay Dhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2361 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2361 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 83 Supp. 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Bail App 139/2026 CrlM(1262/2026)
GHULAM HASSAN GANIE AND OTHERS …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Ms. Anjum, Advocate
Vs. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SOGAM
...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 29-07-2026
The petitioners have approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail without approaching the court of first instance.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the learned Sessions Judge, Kupwara was on leave yesterday, therefore, the petitioners have approached this Court.
Upon enquiry, it has been found that learned Sessions Judge, Kupwara has joined his duties. Therefore, this application, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in judgment titled “Jagdeo Prasad vs. State of Bihar and Others” is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the court of first instance.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 29-07-2026
Aamir