APHC010243202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12708/2026 Between: 1. BURRAMUKKU BUTCHI REDDY, S/O (LATE) B KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-138/1, KUNCHANAPALLI, TADEPALLI - 522 501 2. BURRAMUKKU PAMULU REDDY, S/O (LATE) B KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-138/1, KUNCHANAPALLI, TADEPALLI - 522 501 3. SMT.K.SIVAMMA, W/O SAMBI REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-91, PYARI COMPANY GATE CENTER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DT.-522501 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI., SECRETARY MA AND UD DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 2. MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP., BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI-522503 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TAMMA POOJA DEEPTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Tamma Pooja Deepthi, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipal Corporation, dated 06.05.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioners, has taken this Court through the Contents of the Affidavit, particularly Para 3 of the Affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition. 4. Having considered the contents of the Written Instructions, wherein it has been stated in the penultimate paragraph that the Respondents have not started laying the road in question and that the respondents have not passed any Order to lay the road in question, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the Respondent Authorities to follow due process of law. 5. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.05.2026 DSV 54 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12708/2026 07.05.2026 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No : WRIT PETITION NO: 12708/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 2. 07.05.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV