APHC010436732024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22717 OF 2024 Between: 1. ST JOSEPH CO-OPERATIVE MILK SUPPLY SOCIETY, REGD NO. 2177/67, SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND PARISH PRIEST, FR PULI JOJAPPA. 2. KOMMU VIJAYA RAJU @ MUSALAIAH,, S/O AGASTIN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SUDDAPALLI RAMESH,, S/O BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. RESIDENT OF SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SUDDAPALLI PRASAD,, S/O MADHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESIDENT OF SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SIDDALA SAGAR, PUNNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. RESIDENT OF SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATT OF A.P., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEBROLU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. DANKA VENKATA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHO, CHEBROLU POLICE STATION, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. JONNALAGADDA PITCHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OEE.POLICE CONSTABLE, CHEBROLU POLICE STATION, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. PINAPATI ANITHA PRANUTHI, W/O D.NAGA RAJU, R/O SUDDAPALLI VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in threatening to seize the tractor and other agriculture implements and threatening to detain the petitioners 2 to 5 and other members of 1st Petitioner society and restraining them from doing agricultural activities in respect of plaint schedule property in O.S.No. 547 of 2024 in an extent of Ac 13.44 cents in Sy No. 133,134,132/D and 140/B of Suddapalli Village, Chebrole Mandal, Guntur District inspite of ad-interim injunction granted on 18.05.2024 in I.A.No. 602 of 2024 in O.S.No. 547 of 2024 in the court of the III Additional th Judicial Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur at the instance of 6 respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India . Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GHANTA SRIDHAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22717 of 2024 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in threatening to seize the tractor and other agriculture implements and threatening to detain the petitioners 2 to 5 and other members of 1st Petitioner society and restraining them from doing agricultural activities in respect of plaint schedule property in O.S.No. 547 of 2024 in an extent of Ac 13.44 cents in Sy No. 133,134,132/D and 140/B of Suddapalli Village, Chebrole Mandal, Guntur District in spite of ad-interim injunction granted on 18.05.2024 in I.A.No. 602 of 2024 in O.S.No. 547 of 2024 in the court of the III Additional th Judicial Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur at the instance of 6 respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India.” 2. Heard Sri T.V. SRIDEVI, learned counsel for petitioner(s) and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute and threatening the petitioners to detain them and to seize the tractor and other agriculture implements and also to restrain the agriculture operations of the petitioners despite the ad-interim injunction granted by the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent police never interfered into the civil dispute and the police are never violated the interim orders passed by the III Additional Junior Civil Judge. 5. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to not to interfere in the civil dispute, except the due process of law. 6. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 333 WRIT PETITION NO: 22717 of 2024 Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK