Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. PT. No.107 of 2026 Decided on: 17.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Bimla
...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others
...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
, Judge
(Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 11.09.2026, issued by the Executive Engineer, Shimla Urban Division, HPPWD, Shimla-3 and copy of office order dated 18.02.2026, passed by the Executive Engineer, Shimla Division No.III, HPPWD, Shimla-3, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 18.02.2026, reveals that the petitioner has been granted the work charge status w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and further her pay has also been fixed.
3. Since this Court had only given direction to the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 respondents to examine the case of the petitioner for conferment of work charge status, in terms of the mandate contained in the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, titled, The State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Surajmani & Anr., decided on 06.02.2025 and thereafter grant the work charge status, the
judgment dated 03.12.2025, passed in CWPOA No.2523 of 2020, titled, Bimla vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, has been complied with and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the consequential benefits after refixation of the pay of the petitioner is not granted in favour of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in aforementioned
judgment sought to be executed, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand
disposed of. 17 th September
, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge