APHC010439772013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5973/2013 Between: 1. The Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation Limited,, Rep..By Its Chief Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Engineer, Tl & Ss, A.P.Transco,, Sankarapuram, Kadapa, Ysr Kadapa District. 3. The Superintending Engineer,, Tl & Ss, A.P.Transco, Sankarapuram, Ysr Kadapa District. 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, A.P.Transco, Vempally Road, Yerraguntla, Ysr Kadapa District. 5. The Assistant Engineer, Maintenance, 132/33 Kv Sub-Station, Rameswaram, Proddatur, Ysr Kadapa District. ...Petitioner(S) AND 1. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal, Secretary, Labour Employment, Training And Factories (Lab-I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court Rep By Its, Chairman-Cum- Presiding Officer, Anantapur. 3. Y Karunakar, S/O Y.Prabhakar, Aged About 39 Years Occ: Contractor, R/O 8/10/14. Srinivasapuram, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 4. K Asher, S/O K.Joseph, Aged About 37 Years, Occ: Ex-Contract 2 Labourer, R/O 3/2168, Raja Reddy Street, Kadapa, Ysr Kadapa District. ...Respondent(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for records pertaining to the industrial dispute in I.D.No.146 of 2009 from the Respondent No.2 and the consequential publication of the Respondent No.1 vide G.O.Rt.No.1107, dated 20-9-2012 and declare them as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently set aside the order dated 9-8-2012 passed by the Respondent No.2 in the above said industrial dispute IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 7441 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award dated 09.08.2012 passed in I.D.No.146 of 2009 by the respondent no.2 and publication vide G.O.Rt.No. 1107, dated 20.09.2012 issued by the respondent no.1 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 30420 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 2. Y NAGI REDDY (APTRANSCO) 3. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI 3. P NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 19.01.2026 PNS