Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23602 (AP)

Devarapalli Mallikamba v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26726/2021 · 2026-01-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010440562021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 26726 of 2021 Between: 1. DEVARAPALLI MALLIKAMBA, W/O. VASIANTHA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.D.ND.2-146, 8TH WARD, BAHUBALI BALENDURI GUDAM, GANNAVARAM MANDALAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT -521101. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. DEVARAPALLI MOHANA RAO, S/O BIKSHALU @ SUNDARAM, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC RETD EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.3- 80, BAHUBALENDRUNIGUDEM , KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DT.19.06.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2022. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the application of the Petitioner dt.03-09-2021 for mutation of Petitioner name in Adangal in respect of land of an extent of Ac.1-01 cents that is 0.27 cents in 2 R.S.No.6/12 and an extent of 0.74 cents in R.S.No. 6/3 in Bahubali Balenduri Gudam Village of Gannavaram Mandal,' Krishna District as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to mutate the name of the Petitioner on her application forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. B V ANJANEYULU The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the orders passed in W.P.No.4875 of 2023 dated 02.01.2026, the present Writ Petition No.26726 of 2021 is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.01.2026 Siva/CMK 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.26726 of 2021 Date: 02.01.2026 Siva/CMK