M/s Garrison Constructions v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/22890/2025 · 2026-03-30
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010437572025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 22890/2025 Between:
1. M/S GARRISON CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G. HEMANTH REDDY, S/O. G. BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.7-128/2, SRINAGAR COLONY,
NEAR VIKUNTAPURAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (MKTG-II) DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYATRAJ, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I. SUB-DIVISION, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. Page 2 of 5
6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment of lst and part bill amount of Rs. 20,43,999/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e.. Package No APAM/Chittoor/Palamaner/09, Repairs and relaying of existing damaged 3 rural BT roads in V.kota Mandal of Palamaner Constituency in Chittoor District' in Maintance and Renewals to the road from Peddbhairnepalle road to Jangamgurivepalle in V kota Mandal, vide Agreement No.24/2022-23, dt.25.08.2022, is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of balance amount of Rs. 20,43,999/- with interest @12percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of balance amount of Rs.
20,43,999/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e., “Package No: APAM/Chittoor/Palamaner/ 09, Repairs 8& relaying of existing damaged 3 rural BT roads in V.kota Mandal of Palamaner Constituency in Chittoor District” in Maintance and Renewals to the road from Peddbhairnepalle road to Jangamgurivepalle in V kota Mandal, vide Agreement No.24/2022-23, dt.25.08.2022, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV p. 3 The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Anand Surya, learned counsel representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development & Finance and Planning Department, for the respondents. 2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the respondents in withholding the payment of 1st and part bill amount of Rs.20,43,999/- payable to the petitioner in relation to the work executed by it i.e., Package No:APAM/Chittoor/Palamaner/09, Repairs & Relaying of existing damaged 3 rural BT Roads in V.Kota Mandal of Palamaner Constituency in Chittoor District, vide Agreement No.24/2022-23 dated 25.08.2022, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, submitted instructions of the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Chittoor, dated 20.03.2026. 4. A perusal of the said instructions would disclose that the petitioner has executed the aforementioned work for a total value of Rs.31,43,999/- and the net amount payable to the petitioner after statutory recovery of Rs.3,75,742/-, is Rs.27,68,257/-. The written instructions are made as part of the record. 5. Thus, as seen from the instructions, there is no dispute regarding the execution of the aforementioned work and the petitioner’s entitlement for Rs.27,68,257/-. Since the amount payable is admitted and undisputed, the writ petition is maintainable.
In M/s Utkal Highways Engineers and Contractors v. Chief General Manager & Ors1, it was held at Para No.8 as under:
“Be that as it may, the High court has not dealt with the merits of the writ petition. Moreover, it is not an inviolable rule that no money claim can be adjudicated upon in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Non-payment of p. 4
1 2025 SCC online SC 1400
admitted dues, inter alia, may be considered an arbitrary action on the part of respondents and for claiming the same, a writ petition may lie. Further, throwing a writ petition on ground of availability of alternative remedy after 10 years, particularly, when parties have exchanged their affidavits, is not the correct course unless there are disputed questions of fact which by their very nature cannot be adjudicated upon without recording formal evidence.”
6. Given the instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Chittoor, though there is a small variation in the amount claimed by the petitioner and the amount determined by the official, as payable to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release the amount of Rs.27,68,257/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Sixty Eight Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Seven only) payable to the petitioner regarding execution of aforementioned work, within four (04) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 31.03.2026 SNI p. 5 227 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 22890 OF 2025
Date: 31.03.2026 SNI