Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23594 (AP)

KOTA R.CHANDRA BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6380/2021 · 2026-03-31

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010441002021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6380/2021 Between: 1. KOTA R.CHANDRA BABU, S/O. K.N. RAMAMOORTHY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF . DOOR NO. 1-69, LAKSHMIPURAM, RAGIMANIPENTA, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH PIN- 517429. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH S.H.O.,GAJULAMANDYAM POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHI URBAN., REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. P VENKATESH, S/O . PAKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MARRIGUNTA VILLAGE, YELLAMANDHYAMPANCHAYATI, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto allow the petition, and quash the fir no. 155/2020 of Gajulamandyarn p.s., thirupathi Urban, in the interests of justice and equity.and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all the further proceedings in the above said case, in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/Accused No.4 to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.155 of 2020 of Gajulamandyam Police Station, Tirupathi Urban. 2. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted that police, after completion of investigation, in the aforesaid crime, filed charge sheet before the V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati, as against A.1 only, duly deleting names of A.2 to A.4, and in view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Criminal Petition and it has become in fructuous. 3. In view of the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J Date:01.04.2026 PGT