[2026:JHHC:24553] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7696 of 2026 ------ 1. Rohit Ram @ Rohit Kumar son of Late Binod Ram, aged about 20 years, resident of Village- Kumhar Toli Parnala, P.O. + P.S.- Sadar Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. 2. Raju Ram, son of Late Binod Ram, aged about 24 years, resident of Village- Kumhar Toli Parnala, P.O. + P.S.- Sadar Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agarwal, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-17-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 1018 of 2026 (S.T. No. 298 of 2026) registered for the offence punishable under Sections 305(a), 331(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners committed theft in the house of the informant after breaking open the lock of the house and looted cash of Rs.20,000/- and jewellery. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false and the petitioners are not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused and recovery of looted articles. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in jail custody since 09.03.2026, as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is then submitted that co-accused of this case has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 05.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7304 of 2026. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioners may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Session Judge -VI, Hazaribagh in connection with Hazaribagh Sadar P.S case no.60 of 2026 corresponding to G.R No.1018 of 2026 (S.T Case no. 298 of 2026) with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 17.08.2026 Amar/