( 2026:JHHC:24375 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4528 of 2026 1. Ramesh Vishwakarma, aged about 56 years, son of late Khakhnu Vishwakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau 2. Gopal Vishwakarma, aged about 40 years, son of Khakhnu Vishwakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau 3. Upendra Viswakarma, aged about 31 years, son of Naresh Vishwakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. Rajwadih, P.S. Medininagar Sadar, District-Palamau 4. Om Prakash Vishwakarma, aged about 36 years, son of Suresh Vishwakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. Rajwadih, P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau 5. Shani Viswakarma @ Sunny Vishwarkama, aged about 21 years, son of Ramesh Viswakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. Rajwadih, P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau 6. Dharmendra Vishwakarma, aged about 33 years, son of Naresh Vishwakarma, resident of Khanwa, P.O. Rajwadih, P.S. Daltonghanj, District-Palamau ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Komal S. Narayan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. 02/ 14.08.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daltonganj Sadar P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025 registered under sections 303(2), 74, 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 109, 308 (3), 352, 351(2) and 3 (5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Palamau. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and the altercation took place due to land dispute and entire family members have been made accused. She next submits that injury is simple in nature which has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. She next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. On these grounds, she ( 2026:JHHC:24375 ) submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there. 5. On perusal of F.I.R. it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. In the F.I.R it is alleged that assault has been made by means of axe on the head but injury has been found to be simple which has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. There are case and counter case between the parties and the altercation took place due to land dispute. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Palamau, in connection with Daltonganj Sadar P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.14. 08.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-