Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23581 (JHR)

DINESH KUMAR And ANR v. G.M.,SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY And O

WPC/1601/2011 · 2026-08-20

Sanjay Prasad, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:25277-DB ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1601 of 2011 --------- 1.Dinesh Kumar, son of Sri Awadh Bihari Mehta, resident of Electronic Loco Shed, TataNagar (S.E.R.) P.O. Golpahari, P.S.-Parsudih, Dist-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand 2.Ravi Kumar Bharti son of Sri Ram Narayan Ram, resident of New Electronic Loco Shed, Tatanagar (S.E.R.) P.O.-Golpahari, P.S.-Parsudih, Dist-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand ..… Petitioners Versus 1.General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata-43 2.Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Chakradharpur Division, dist.-Singhbhum (West) Jharkhand 3.Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist.-Singhbhum (East), Jharkhand 4. Senior Personal Officer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist.-Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand 5.Assistant Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Tatanagar, Dist. Singhbhum (East) Jharkhand ….. Respondents ---------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Sr.Advocate Ms. Mahua Palit, Advocate For the Resp 1 to 5 : Mr. Vikas Kishore, Advocate Senior Panel Counsel (Central Govt.) ---------- 19/20.08.2026 Mrs. M.M. Pal, Learned Senior Counsel, representing the petitioners, assisted by Ms. Mahua Palit, learned Counsel has submitted that the matter is an old one and she is having no instruction and as such she is not in a position to argue the matter. It is submitted that earlier also it has been brought to the notice of the Court that she was having no instruction and the said Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:25277-DB ) 2 submission has been recorded in the order dated 22.06.2022. 2. learned counsel for the Railways is present. 3. Under the circumstances, considering the submission made by the learned Senior Counsel, the matter is to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, this W.P.(S) No. 1601 of 2011 is dismissed. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) s.m. Dated 20.08.2026