2026:JHHC:25281 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6575 of 2026 Ravindra Paswan, aged about 32 years, S/O Sri Vinod Paswan @ Binod Paswan, R/o Naudiha Khajuri, P.O+P.S- Chhatarpur, District - Palamu. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, Advocate --- 04/21.08.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2026 in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2024 registered under section 191(2)/191(3)/190/126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/74/303(2)/109 of B.N.S, 2023 and subsequently due to change of circumstance section 103(1) of B.N.S, 2023 was added. The case is pending in the court of learned A.D.J.-V Palamau, at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the charge sheet has already been submitted. He has further submitted that after the alleged incident, the father of the informant expired on account of the injury sustained by him. Learned counsel has submitted that, in the first information report, there is direct allegation against Manoj Paswan, who had assaulted the father of the informant of the case, and Manoj Paswan @ Manoj Kumar Paswan has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 11590 of 2025 vide order dated 23.12.2025. Learned counsel has further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and there is case and counter case between the parties. He has referred to paragraph 8 of the bail application. He has further submitted that, as per the allegation against the petitioner in the first information report, he had assaulted the son 2026:JHHC:25281 2 and brother-in-law of the informant, but they have suffered simple injuries. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has submitted that there is allegation of use of a Lathi so far as the petitioner is concerned. However, the other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the main assailant Manoj Paswan, against whom there is allegation of assaulting the father of the informant who died, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and there are also case and counter case between the parties, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-V Palamau, at Daltonganj in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2024 on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the informant of this case in any manner. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 2026:JHHC:25281 3 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 21.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-24.08.2026