Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23569 (AP)

ALA CHINA KONDALA RAO v. P .VENKATESWARA RAO AND 3 OTHERS

MACMA/964/2012 · 2026-01-30

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010431262012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 964/2012 Between: 1. ALA CHINA KONDALA RAO, D.NO. 1/115, LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, ...APPELLANT AND 1. P VENKATESWARA RAO AND 3 OTHERS, S/O ACHAIAH, OWNER OF AUTO NO. AP 7 X 620 R/O D.NO. 3-34, MULAPADU VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, 2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. P RAMESH, S/O CHANDARAM OWNER OF AUTO NO.AP 16 TU 4642 LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA. 2 AHHS,J M.A.C.M.A.NO.964 OF 2012 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased toset aside the judgment and Decree in OP.NO. 213 of 2006 dated 1-8-2008 on the file of the MACT cum VII Addl. Dist.and Sessions Judge [FTC] Vijayawada and to allow the OP in full by awarding the compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- IA NO: 1 OF 2009(MACMAMP 5623 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 369 days in preferring this appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU 2. V KRISHNA RAO 3. . The Court made the following: 3 AHHS,J M.A.C.M.A.NO.964 OF 2012 JUDGMENT:- Though the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there was no representation for the appellant on 05.12.2025 and 23.01.2026. Even today i.e., on 31.01.2026, there is no representation for the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. Considering the conduct of the appellant, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J 31.01.2026 LSP