2026:JHHC:24610 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5818 of 2026 1. Parvej Ansari @ Parwej Ansari, Aged about - 23 Years, S/O -Late Hakim Ansari 2. Tabrej Ansari @ Tabraij Ansari, Aged about - 20 Years, S/O -Late Hakim Ansari Both the Petitioner no. 1 & 2, R/o- Dulampur, P.O & P.S -Budhai, District- Deoghar, State- Jharkhand. 3. Md. Niyaz @ Niyaz Ansari, Aged about 23 Years, S/O Salim Ansari, R/o Village - Bucha Nawadih, P.O & P.S - Bengabad, District- Giridih, State- Jharkhand. … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Govind Ray Karan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 08/17th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody in connection with Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 arising out of Cyber Case No. 09 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 111(2)(ii)/ 111(3)/ 111(4)/ 317(5)/ 319(2)/ 318(4)/ 338/ 336(3)/ 340(2) /3(5) of BNS & Section 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of the IT Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 13.11.2025 and the charge been framed on 20.04.2026. The learned counsel has referred to paragraph 15 of the counter-affidavit to submit that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. The learned counsel has further referred to the earlier order passed by this Court in B.A. No. 1948 of 2026 and has submitted that at the time of rejection of bail on 08.04.2026, liberty was given to the 2026:JHHC:24610 2 petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. The learned counsel has submitted that in the meantime, a few co-accused, namely, Aftab Ansari and Tafajul Ansari have been enlarged on bail by this Court in B.A. No. 4330/2026 on 11.06.2026 and B.A. No. 1023 of 2026 on 27.02.2026 respectively. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, he does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. The learned counsel for the State has submitted that, so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, six crime links have been found against him, whereas no crime links have been found against petitioner nos. 2 and 3. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioners since 13.11.2025 and the fact that the charge has already been framed and that the other co-accused, namely, Aftab Ansari and Tafajul Ansari have already been granted bail, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih in connection with Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of their single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners would deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their Mobile Number before the learned court below, which they shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. 2026:JHHC:24610 3 (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 17.08.2026 Uploaded On: 18.08.2026 Mukul/-