Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2356 (UTT)

SANJEEV PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/105/2015 · 2026-03-20

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1991-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB 105/2015 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional CSC, for the State. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate, for the Public Service Commission. (2) Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned Counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, submits that petitioner participated in a selection, which was held pursuant to advertisement issued in 2014. He submits that selection process has concluded long back and petitioner was declared unsuccessful in the preliminary examination and he could not reach the stage of main examination. He thus submits that relief as claimed cannot be granted. (3) In view of statement made by Mr. Pankaj Miglani, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 20.3.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e 61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB 588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.03.20 17:21:25 +05'30' 2026:UHC:1991-DB