2026:JHHC:25076 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 2427 of 2026 …. Md. Farhan Tahir @ Mohammad Farhan Tahir @ Farhan Tahir, aged about 33 years, S/O Tahir Ahmad @ Md. Tahir, Resident of Village-Chitarpur, Rahmat Nagar, P.O.-Chitarpur, P.S.-Rajrappa, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sabana Prabin, W/O Md. Farhan Tahir, Daughter of Jalaluddin Ansari, resident of Village-Tiruldih, P.O.-Tiruldih, P.S.-Tiruldih, District-Seraikela-Kharsawan, Jharkhand .…… Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the petitioner : Mr. Nehru Mahto, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, A. P. P. ….. ORAL ORDER IN COURT 02/19.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The instant Cr. M. P. No. 2427 of 2026 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025, which stood dismissed for default vide order dated 16.06.2025 due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court, by not filing the requisites within time for issuance of service of notice upon the opposite party no. 2 and also due to non- deposit of Rs. 40,000/- in the name of opposite party no. 2. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has deposited Rs. 40,000/- in the name of the opposite party no. 2 in compliance of the order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025 before the learned Trial Court on 25.11.2025 2026:JHHC:25076 -2- through Demand Draft No. 3108 dated 17.11.2025 and photocopy of the certified copy of the order dated 25.11.2025 of the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Original Maintenance Case No. 36 of 2022 has been enclosed as Annexure-2 of this Cr. M. P. It is further submitted that the petitioner has further given Rs. 10,000/- to the opposite party no. 2 by way of Demand Draft No. 178100 dated 12.06.2026 and photocopy of the said demand draft has been enclosed as Annexure-3 of this Cr.M.P. and hence, Cr. M. P. No. 2427 of 2026 may be allowed and Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025 may be restored to its original file. 4. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and from going through the records, it appears that the petitioner has deposited Rs. 40,000/- in the name of the opposite party no. 2 in compliance of the order dated 07.05.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025 before the learned Trial Court on 25.11.2025 through Demand Draft No. 3108 dated 17.11.2025 and photocopy of the certified copy of the order dated 25.11.2025 of the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Original Maintenance Case No. 36 of 2022 has been enclosed as Annexure-2 of this Cr. M. P. 6. It further appears that the petitioner has further paid Rs. 10,000/- to the opposite party no. 2 by way of Demand Draft No. 178100 dated 12.06.2026 and photocopy of the said demand draft in favour of the opposite party no. 2 has been enclosed as Annexure-3 of this Cr.M.P. 7. In view of the submission made above and also in 2026:JHHC:25076 -3- view of the averment made in para- 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the instant petition, the present Cr. M. P. No. 2427 of 2026 is allowed and Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025 is restored to its original file. 8. Thus, Cr. M. P. No. 2427 of 2026 is allowed and stands disposed of. 9. Office to list Criminal Revision No. 399 of 2025 as per roster. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 19.08.2026 Kamlesh/