Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23555 (KAR)

KODIMATA AND AJJAMPURA SHETTARY BAKKAPPA CHARITABLE TRUST (R) v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18392/2026 · 2026-06-23

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31104 WP No. 18392 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18392 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. KODIMATA AND AJJAMPURA SHETTARY BAKKAPPA CHARITABLE TRUST (R) SUKSHETRA KODIMATA MAHASAMSTHANA, HARANAHALLI, ARSIKERE-573122 HASSAN DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE, TRUSTEE, SRI SRI SRI DR. SHIVANANDA SHIVAYOGI RAJENDRA SWAMIJI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH B. MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573122 3. THE SUB-REGISTRAR ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573122 4. SRI GURUSIDDESH .A.B MAJOR, R/O HASSAN ROAD CIRCLE Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31104 WP No. 18392 of 2026 ARSIKERE TOWN-572103 HASSAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; NOTICE TO R4 - D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATION DATED 12/06/2026 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, WITHIN SUCH TIME AS MAY BE FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT, AFTER AFFORDING OPPORTUNITY TO THE AFFECTED PARTIES VIDE., ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. Notice to respondent No.4 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: 1. Directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12/06/2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within such - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31104 WP No. 18392 of 2026 time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, after affording opportunity to the affected parties vide., Annexure-A. 2. Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. Essentially what the petitioner is seeking for is consideration of the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2026 by the Tahsildar and Sub- Registrar. 5. By way of the said representation, the petitioner has requested them not to transfer the katha or undertake any registration of any document till the disposal of MSA No.253/2025 before the High Court of Karnataka and Civil Suit in O.S.No.65/2018 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arsikere. The same is in the nature of injunction, which cannot be passed by the Tahasildar or the Sub-Registrar on the basis of the private representation made to them by the petitioner. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31104 WP No. 18392 of 2026 6. It would be for the petitioner to approach the appropriate Court, get appropriate orders and then, approach the respondents. 7. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13